From Nile Gardiner, over at The London Daily Telegraph, we learn [tip of the fedora to David Kochis and Donald Douglas]:
The US State Department has issued a statement in the aftermath of yesterday’s barbaric killing of a British soldier by Islamist militants in Woolwich. It reads in full:
The United States condemns today’s attack in the Woolwich district of London. We stand with our U.K. allies in the face of such senseless violence. Our thoughts and condolence are with the family of the victim and the British people.
This is exactly the same language President Obama used to describe the killing of the US Ambassador to Libya and three American personnel in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, at a Rose Garden press conference on September 12…
Hell, as Mr. Kochis reminds us, even David ‘The Squishinator’ Cameron used the word ‘terrorism’:
British Prime Minister David Cameron acknowledged the motivations behind yesterday’s cowardly act by saying:
This country will be absolutely resolute in its stand against violent extremism and terror. We will never give in to terror—or terrorism—in any of its forms. Second, this view is shared by every community in our country. This was not just an attack on Britain—and on our British way of life. [BOB: However, PM Squish then proceeds to get his Quisling on, but, at least, he called the incident what it is] It was also a betrayal of Islam—and of the Muslim communities who give so much to our country. There is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act. We will defeat violent extremism by standing together.
In stark contrast, the Obama Administration’s response has been to avoid calling the attack terrorism, let alone terrorism motivated by a radical Islamic ideology….
Mr. Gardiner remarks:
It’s time for President Obama to acknowledge reality. This is a global war between the free world and the forces of Islamist terror. These are not acts of “senseless violence.” They are acts of brutal terrorism aimed against Great Britain, the United States and all who defend the principles of liberty, freedom and Western-style democracy. It is important that political leaders on both sides of the Atlantic identify exactly who the enemy is, what their aims are, and why they must be emphatically defeated.
But the Left, which is in firm control of the Culture and governments of The West, have no desire to acknowledge that Truth. Some of them deny it because they are hopeless True Believer / Kumbaya types and others because it suits them to shield their fellow Totalitarians [ie: The Mohammedins] from being exposed for what they are.
The leaders of the nations of The West are all willing Dhimmis.
Could This Be One Explanation?
